OGBONNAYA AKPARA
FUNDAMENTALS OF SOCIAL BEHAVIORAL HEALTH TOPICS
Naming and Addressing Racism: A Primer by Ogbonnaya Akpara
The webinar begins with webinar 1 talking about how racism continues to diminish the United
States of America. The definition of racism is a system of structuring opportunity and assigning
value based on the social interpretation of how one looks. Racism unfairly disadvantages some
individuals and communities. There are three types of racism. The three types of racism are: 1)
Internalized racism, 2) Personally-mediated racism, and 3) Institutional racism.
Internalized racism is the acceptance by the stigmatized races of negative treatment on our own
abilities and intrinsic worth. Examples are: 1) Self-devaluation, 2) White man's ice is colder and
3) Resignation,hopelessness, and helplessness. Personally-mediated racism is differential
assumptions about the abilities, motives and intents of others by race. It also has to do with
prejudice and discrimination for example: 1) Police brutality, 2) Physician disrespect, 3)
Shopkeeper vigilance, 4) Waiter indifference, and 5) Teacher devaluation. Institutional racism is
the differential access to the goods, services and opportunities of society, by "race". Example: 1)
Housing, education,employment, and income (A lack of these will lead to health disparities), 2)
Medical Facilities (Linguistic access), 3) Clean Environment, 4) Information ( Health
Information), resources (Knowing someone from the inside) and voice ( government and
media).
The leadingg cause of death in the United States are heart disease, cancer, diabetes, infant
mortality and suicide. Healthy People 2020 explains that health starts in our own homes, schools,
workplaces, neighborhoods and communities. A key social determinant is education. Social
determinants of health are conditions in the environment in which people are born, live, learn,
work, play, age, and worship that affects a wide range of health.
Webinar 2's title: No Safety, No Health: A Conversation about Race, Place and Preventing
Violence was a short webinar that talks about race, place and preventing violence. Neighborhood
violence is a preventable public health issue and it is shaped by many factors, including racism.
Violence impacts our health and well-being, and also prevents neighborhoods from realizing
their full potential.
Webinar3's title: Unequal Treatment: Disparities in Access, Quality and Care talks about the
Affordable Care Act and how it has led to the growth in health insurance coverage. Racial and
ethnic minorities lack access to quality care and have bad health outcomes. These health
disparities intimidate our country. Racism is within the healthcare system and we are addressing
discrimination to improve public health by creating incentives to better align health
care resources with community needs. Also, they are increasing diversity among providers and
monitoring health care access and quality discrimination.
Webinar4's title: Racism:The Silent Partner in High School Dropout and Health Disparities talks
about fifty million students attending high school this fall. Two-thirds of African AMerican and
three-fourths of Latino students will graduate on time. More than half of all students attending
public school live in poverty. Obstacles to high school graduation are key public health concern
because high school graduation is a leading indicator of healthy adult behavior and health status.
Mr. Troutman and Mr. Murphy analyzes how current policies and practices in educational
systems disproportionately impact students of color and contribute to disproportionate dropout
rates.The study Racism:The Silent Partner in High School Dropout and Health Disparities shows that
the prevalence of Asians and Blacks involving high school graduation rates are as follows:
93.1% of Asians are high school graduates and 66.1% of Blacks are high school graduates. This
means that there is a 27% gap between Asians and Blacks when it comes to percentage-wise. The
high school dropout rate for Blacks is 33.9%. This percentage is high because it is almost near
the half way percentage mark. The Asian high school dropout is 6.9%. This percentage is low
compared to the dropout rate of Blacks.
Roberts, a legal scholar and author of Roberts, a legal scholar and author of fatal invention: How
Science, Politics and Big Business Re-create Race in the Twenty first century
Collapse
The video clip begins with Mr. Tavis Smiley congratulating Mrs. Dorothy Roberts on her book
that is called "Fatal Intervention: How Science, Politics, and Big Business Recreate Race in the
Twenty-First Century. Mrs. Roberts is a professor of law at Northwestern and the chair of the
board of directors at the Black Women's Health Imperative. Mrs. Dorothy defines Fatal
Intervention as a race in the United States. She goes on to say that an intervention is a political
system that was created out of slavery and colonialism that continues to exist today to govern
people. Fatal means that it has caused devastating inequalities that continue to this day.
The FDA accepts a drug called BiDil and Mrs. Roberts explains that there was no evidence that
BiDil worked differently in African Americans than in people of other races. Mrs. Roberts
examines the political and commercial incentives for continuing the categorization of people by
race. C,ommercial incentives today to produce products by race is based on false assumptions,
that you can divide up the human species into biological groups called races says Mrs. Roberts.
She goes on to say that commercial incentives is like race-based medicine. Companies and
researchers are looking for race-based products that can replace individual drugs tailored to our
genotype.
Mrs. Roberts explains mass incarceration of African American women and men, increase in
poverty, and the poverty gap between Blacks and whites in this country. The health gap is high,
infant mortality among Blacks is three times that of whites and maternal mortality is four times
that of whites. Mrs. Roberts talks about health disparities and how it is still continuing in the US.
We are being told that race is not a factor anymore and Mrs. Roberts explains that we will never
achieve equality if we do not address that race is real.
"When the Bough Breaks" from the Unnatural Causes series
Collapse
In the video "When the Bough Breaks" from the Unnatural causes series, the video clip talks
about infant mortality in the United States. Infant mortality is greater in the United States than in
other countries in the world. United States ranks 34th in infant mortality. African Americans have
twice as high rates of infant mortality than White Americans. Educated African American women
have birth outcomes than White women.
Kim Anderson is an Atlanta lawyer and a mother who was pregnant with her first child in 1990.
She did a tremendous job in providing a healthy baby but Mr and Mrs. Anderson were
overwhelmed and traumatized because her newborn weighed less than three pounds. Mrs.
Anderson went into labor before her two and a half month due date. Mrs. Anderson did all the
right things the doctors told her such as: 1) Eating healthy, 2) Exercising, 3) Staying away from
drugs and alcohol, and 4) Receiving excellent parental care.
The elevated you are on the socioeconomic ladder, the lower you are to risk health disparities.
The advantages of wealth and status played a major contributing factor in Mrs. Anderson's health
as well as racism. According to Neonatologist Mr. James Collins and Mr. Richard David, "they
believed that African American women are at an elevated risk during pregnancy of racism as
they encounter it through their everyday life". Dr. Collins and Dr. David displayed that "African
immigrants to the US and US- born white women had the same birth outcomes, yet African
American women prefer to have babies that weigh less. They also displayed that the African-
born group declined or deteriorated within one generation.
Dr. Michael Lu believes that chronic stress is the perpetrator when racism affects pregnancy.
Racial inequity causes anxiety and the release of stress hormones that prompt or promotes
premature labor. Dr. Camara Jones of the Center for Disease Control (CDC) gives an explanation
that people of color experience racism and it is a stressor that is embedded into all the stressors in
a person's life.
Anthropologist Fleda Jackson, Sociologist Mona Phillips and Epidemiologist Carol Hogue are
collaborating to assist and better understand racism and racism's impact on African Americans.
Through groups and programs, Mrs.Jackson, Mrs. Phillips, and Mrs.Hogue are helping African
American women find resources they need to survive in a world surrounding negative impacts on
African American women and the dangerous conditions that remains to be a difficult challenge to
tackle.
In my opinion, I believe that we experience discrimination everywhere we go. For example: the
schools we go to, the jobs we work at, when we walk down the street, and when we go into a
store to buy or even look at something. Sometimes we do not see it openly because they do not
want to expose themselves which is overt racism. They usually do it secretly so that you can read
between the lines and that is covert racism. I experience both covert and overt racism throughout
my life which is very difficult for me to tackle and challenge on a day-to-day basis.
"Place Matters" from the nnatural causes series
Collapse
In the video "Place Matters" from the unnatural causes series, the video clip begins by talking
about the place you live is a good or excellent indicator of health complications or health
disparities. Latino and Southeast Asian immigrants Mr. and Mrs. Boonkeut moved into an
abandoned neighborhoods in Richmond, California, mainly a Black city in the San Francisco
Bay Area. Segregation, lack of jobs and nutritious foods, and affordable housing have been
dangerous to the health of African American residents. Richmond, California has greater than
average rates of asthma hospitalization, lower life expectancy and higher rates of diabetes. Mr.
Boonkeut's region or district has larger rates of poverty, lower income rates and lower
educational attainment. In low-income communities, tobacco, liquor and fast food restaurants are
everywhere while in affluent or wealthy communities, fresh produce or fresh foods are
everywhere.
White families took advantage of federally backed home loans to start fresh in a new district, but
prejudicial policies and practices excluded African American families from those similar
opportunities. Less than 2% of $120 billion in government-backed home loans went to non-white
residents between the years of 1934 and 1962. In Northern, California, 350,000 federally
guaranteed new home loans, went to white families and fewer than 100 went to African
American families. All across the United States, in cities like Richmond, California, African
Americans were left behind in increasingly abandoned neighborhoods. As social conditions
worsened, so did health. Studies have displayed that living in poverty leads to a 50-80% increase
in heart disease- the number one killer in the United States. Stressing over violence in the
communities were individuals live in, lousy schools parents put their children in, unpaid bills,
living in poverty, not having access to fresh foods, reliable transportation are all negative effects
on your health.
To conclude, the video clip ends with a quote from Harvard's David Williams. According to
David Williams, he states that "Housing policy is health policy. Neighborhood improvement
policies are health policies. Everything that we can do to improve the quality of life or
individuals in our society has an impact on their health and is a health policy." This means that
the place you stay or reside has a major impact on your health.
Six Reasons Why Parks Matter for Health
Collapse
This blog talks about the six reasons why parks matter for health. The National Park Service
celebrates its 100 year and has a best-ever achievement 307.2 million visits in 2015. The access
to natural scenery and park activities play a role in improving health. Research shows that public
parks contribute to health in a number of ways, from promoting physical activity to improving
mental health and reducing health care costs.The six reasons why parks matter for health are: 1)
parks foster mental, physical, and spiritual health, 2) parks encourage physical activity, 3) parks
advance health equity, 4) parks helps kids flourish, 5) we need parks to survive, and 6) parks are
powerful prescription to combat chronic disease.
Parks foster mental, physical and spiritual health through the provisions of clean air and water,
and also provides spaces for finding break from the stressors of everyday life. The national park
service has 400 parks, recreation areas that serve as "go-to" resources for people's health and
well-being. Parks encourage physical activity such as moderate exercise and access to outdoor
fitness equipments. Parks advance health equity by helping to restore people from the stress of
day-to-day challenges and struggles. That is especially essential for individuals who are more
likely to experience discrimination.
Parks help kids flourish by creating opportunities for kids to enjoy themselves and interact with
others in an environment where they are shielded from adversities in their daily lives. Parks are
powerful prescription to combat chronic disease by exposing themselves to sunlight which is a
healing process for medical and mental health reasons. We need parks to survive because it helps
biodiversity that we need as a species to survive. They also alleviate or reduce climate change
impact by having green infrastructure that contributes to our air and water quality.To conclude,
there are health disparities in this country and by preventing them through exercise and engaging
in outdoor activities, we can reduce the epidemic of diseases that are prevalent in this country.
Taking advantage of parks is very vital in controlling one's health.
Optional Reading- Robert Wood Johnson Workplace and Health 2016
Collapse
This article talks about Workplace and health based on the title that is presented to me. Where
people reside and work influences their health. According to Robert Wood Johnson Workplace
and Health 2016, scientists found that an individuals job affects their health for more than 4 in
10 working adults. Workers in minimum wage face treacherous or deadly work situations
(45%) compared to those in high-paying jobs (33%). Individuals who find work have a poor
impact on stress (51%) compared to those in medium and high-paying jobs (41%).
One in 5 employees (19%) are laborers, working 50 or more hours a week in their main job.
They do so because they say it is essential their career (56%); and that their workload makes it
difficult to take a vacation. African American employee adults give their organization fair or poor
ratings (37%) on providing a healthy work environment, compared to Hispanics (26%) and white
workers (21%). Women are more likely while employed to have cared for a family member who
was seriously sick, injured or disabled (33%), compared to men (24%); African American are
more likely (41%) to have done so than whites (28%) or Hispanics (20%).
A majority of employees (55%) go to work when ill; including medical employees (60%) and
restaurant employees (50%) who go to work when they have a cold or flu. For most employees,
the workplace provides a healthy work environment (75%) and offers formal wellbeing or health
advancement programs (51%).To conclude, where an individual lives and works strongly
impacts or control an individual's health and wellbeing.
RE: Rethinking Gender Differences in Health: Why We Need to Integrate Social and Biological
Perspectives
Collapse
In the article "Rethinking Gender Differences in Health: Why We Need to Integrate Social and
Biological Perspectives" by Reiker, PP and Bird, CE, the authors discuss the difficulty or
problem of sex-specific differentiation in an individual's health for example men's lower
longevity and a women's relative incidence of disease that continues past intuition of either social
or biological detriment. The division remains in comprehending the ancestry of such distinction
and the problem it arises regarding the similarities between social and biological movement. The
objective of the article is that sex-specific differentiation in health is essential and that
comprehending these distinctions requires interpretation of why individuals are not making
health a major concern in their daily lives. The authors also discuss constrained choice which is a
key element in this article that talks about Gender distinctions in Health and how we have to
incorporate social and biological views. Constrained choice is a very essential problem or
controversy that is lacking the comprehension of these sex-specific distinctions in health. It also
signals the social science neighborhoods to work with the scientist on collaborative work
required to direct the complicated or convoluted differences in men's and women's health.
In today's society, some physical factors that contribute to gender differences in health are as
follows: Women undergoing or encountering larger rates of depression and anxiety disorders
than men while men have larger rates of substance abuse, antisocial behavior and suicide than
women. According to the article, "there are three reference conditions that exhibit substantial
gender differences and they are: CVD, immune function and disorders and depression". The
authors also state that"men and women's physical health are very confusing. Women live longer
than men, yet they have higher morbidity rates".This means that women have a longer lifespan
than men even though they have a relative incidence of disease that often occurs.
According to the article, some of the social factors that contribute to gender differences in health
have not been used while scientists have investigated or reviewed some of the pathways through
which social factors might differentially affect men and women's health including positive and
negative health behaviors, exposure to stressors and coping lifestyles. In order for an individual
to lists some social factors that contribute to gender differences in health, the individual must
integrate social and biological procedures to preferably comprehend the distinction in men and
women's health.
The economic factors that contribute to gender differences in health is income. According to the
article, sex-specific differentiation in income may result from a variation and diversity of factors
over the life course including occupational choice, opportunities for employment and
advancement, work-related skills and experience, as well as job benefits including health
insurance, pension, and retirement income. Women are more than likely to be a single parent and
have reduced income per capita. The gain of income on health would be expected to be similar
for men and women, the levels of income may vary by sex-specific for a variety of reasons other
than the job one currently has. Welfare and income entitlements such as social security are tied to
both one's own employment and income history and that of one's spouse according to the article.
To conclude, gender differences in health is vital and we need to incorporate or integrate social
and biological perspectives. Constrained choice is a very crucial or key part that is lacking the
grasp or mastery of gender-specific distinctions in health. Constrained choice includes the gain
of governmental and workplace policies on men and women's health.
References
Rieker, P. P., & Bird, C. E. (2005). Rethinking gender differences in health: why we
need to integrate social and biological perspectives. The Journals of Gerontology
Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 60 (Special Issue 2), S40-S47.
Optional Viewing: The Health Belief Model History, Constructs and Applications by Andy
DeDomenic
Collapse
The video clip talks about the history of the health belief model, the constructs of the health
belief model and the applications of the health belief model. The health belief model
(HBM) began in the 1950s from the work of social psychologists in the US. public health
service. These pyschologists were faced with the problem that very few individuals were
partaking in and these individuals were participating in preventive and disease detection
programs. There were theories that assisted in helping to develop the health belief model and
they were: Atkinson's risk-taking model, Feather's decision making under uncertainty model,
Rotters Reinforcement Model, Edwards subjective expected utility model, and
Tolman's performance behavior theory.
The constructs of the health belief model are as follows: perceived susceptibility, perceived
severity, pereceived barriers, cues to action, perceived benefits, and self-efficacy. Perceived
susceptibility is the belief that an individual has with regard to obtaining or receiving a disease or
reaching a harmful state as a result of partaking in a behavior. Perceived severity is an
individual's instinctive or personal belief in the extent of harm that can result of a specific
behavior. Perceived benefits is the belief in the advantages of the methods suggested for
diminishing the risk or seriousness of the disease or harmful state resulting from a specific
behavior. Perceived barriers is the belief concerning the actual and imagined costs of the new
behavior. Cues to Action is the precipitating forces that make an individual feel the need to take
action. Self-efficacy is the confidence an individual has in his or her ability to pursue a behavior.
The applications of the health belief model has been used for behavioral research in: Modeling
for physical activity behavior, Predictors of health behaviors in college students, Socio-
psychological modeling for diabetes and many more. The health belief model is the first theory
that was developed exclusively for health related behaviors.
Optional Viewing: Introduction to the Theory of Planned Behavior
Collapse
The video clip's aim is to talk about the predictors of intentions to he theory of planned behavior
and how it affects real life. The three processes of planned behavior are: Behavioral attitudes,
subjective norms and perceived behavioral control. Behavioral attitudes refers to what an
individual thinks and feels about behavior. The behavioral attitude consists of affective attitude
and instrumental attitude. Affective attitude asks a question stating Is the behavior enjoyable or
not?
Instrumental attitude asks the question Is the behavior beneficial or harmful? Subjective norms
refers to support given by significant others example family and friends. Subjective norms
include injunctive norms and descriptive norms. Injunctive norms states how others encourage
the behavior while descriptive behavior states that others do the behavior. Perceived behavioral
control refers to if an individual is capable and confident, and can overcome barriers and
challenges.
When an individual recognizes or distinguishes an activity that is fun and have good benefits,
they are supported with other individuals which also does exercising and feels in control, and are
capable of doing behavior. They will form a tighter intentions and more likely engage in
behavior. The real life situation has to do with Sharron and how she is not execising, has low
control of behavior and lacks confidence in abilities.
Optional viewing: Trans-Theoretical Model of Behavior Change
Collapse
The video clip discusses trans- theoretical model and how it assists an individual to comprehend
the complex stages of process of not ready to change, thinking about change and persisting with
behavior. The aim of this model is to distinguish between the five stages of change. The 5 stages
of change are pre-contemplation, contemplation, preparation, action and maintenance. Pre-
contemplation refers to an individual not ready for a task, unlikely to engage in the near future,
encourages to think about positives and negatives, and very down and defensive. Contemplation
refers to an an individual getting ready for a task, intention to engage in the behavior, appreciates
the positives of change, may still try to avoid action, and has the thought but is unlikely to act.
Preparation refers to an individual ready for a task, gradual steps to fit into their life, and might
tell family and friends to change their behavior. Action refers to an individual doing the behavior,
refers to the need to keep working hard, and also mentions the usefulness to learn techniques to
enhance commitment (acknowledging the steps taking and avoiding people who encourage
unhealthy behaviors). Maintenance refers to the changed and substained behavior, sharing
experiences and seeks support when an individual behaves in a healthy way, and also is essential
or important to be self-aware, need to be challenged, feel competent to overcome barriers.
Optional Viewing: Introduction to the Theory of Planned Behavior
Collapse
The video clip's aim is to talk about the predictors of intentions to he theory of planned behavior
and how it affects real life. The three processes of planned behavior are: Behavioral attitudes,
subjective norms and perceived behavioral control. Behavioral attitudes refers to what an
individual thinks and feels about behavior. The behavioral attitude consists of affective attitude
and instrumental attitude. Affective attitude asks a question stating Is the behavior enjoyable or
not?
Instrumental attitude asks the question Is the behavior beneficial or harmful? Subjective norms
refers to support given by significant others example family and friends. Subjective norms
include injunctive norms and descriptive norms. Injunctive norms states how others encourage
the behavior while descriptive behavior states that others do the behavior. Perceived behavioral
control refers to if an individual is capable and confident, and can overcome barriers and
challenges.
When an individual recognizes or distinguishes an activity that is fun and have good benefits,
they are supported with other individuals which also does exercising and feels in control, and are
capable of doing behavior. They will form a tighter intentions and more likely engage in
behavior. The real life situation has to do with Sharron and how she is not execising, has low
control of behavior and lacks confidence in abilities.
RE: the role of behavioral science theory in development and implementation of public health
interventions
Collapse
In the article "The Role of Behavioral Science Theory in Development and Implementation of
Public Health Interventions" by Glanz, K and Bishop, DB, the authors explain the growing
verification that implies that public health and health-promotion interference are based on social
and behavioral science theory or propositions that are powerful or successful than those that are
non-existent in a theoretical base. Influential contemporary view stresses the multiple
determining factor or decisive factor of health and health behavior. The authors also states that
the most frequent used theories or propositions of health behaviors are social cognitive theory
(SCT), the trans-theoretical model (TTM) /stages of change, the health belief model (HBM) and
the theory of planned behavior (TPB). According to the article, social cognitive theory (SCT) is
the cognitive statement or expression of social learning theory. Trans-theoretical model (TTM) /
stages of change illustrates an individual's drive to modify a behavior. The health belief model
(HBM) was started to assist in comprehending why an individual did or didn't use preventive
services offered by the public health department. The theory of planned behavior (TPB)
identifies cognitive stages of readiness and decision to take action.
According to the article, the authors define theory as "a set of interrelated concepts, definitions
and propositions that explain or predict events or situations by specifying relations among
variables." Moreover, according to the article, the authors also define theory as "a systematic
way of understanding events, behaviors, and/or situations. The question asks how can one
combine theories to have a greater effect on a target population. The answer to that is when an
individual integrates or incorporates theories, it is essential or vital to precisely assume that the
unique contribution has different theories to the combined model according to the article. The
author also states that a developing or expanding body of information implies that interventions
are refined or advanced with an accurate or exact analytical foundation or foundations that are
more useful or adequate than those lacking a analytical base and that some strategies are
combined multiple theories according to the article.
To conclude, the analysis, survey or report of experimentation or investigation on modifying a
variety of health behaviors have shown that interventions are based on theory or theoretical
design that are more adequate or useful than those not using theory. However, the structure that
clarifies the greater effects have not been designed or examined by researchers or scientists.
RE: Rethinking Gender Differences in Health: Why We Need to Integrate Social and Biological
Perspectives
Collapse
In the article "Rethinking Gender Differences in Health: Why We Need to Integrate Social and
Biological Perspectives" by Reiker, PP and Bird, CE, the authors discuss the difficulty or
problem of sex-specific differentiation in an individual's health for example men's lower
longevity and a women's relative incidence of disease that continues past intuition of either social
or biological detriment. The division remains in comprehending the ancestry of such distinction
and the problem it arises regarding the similarities between social and biological movement. The
objective of the article is that sex-specific differentiation in health is essential and that
comprehending these distinctions requires interpretation of why individuals are not making
health a major concern in their daily lives. The authors also discuss constrained choice which is a
key element in this article that talks about Gender distinctions in Health and how we have to
incorporate social and biological views. Constrained choice is a very essential problem or
controversy that is lacking the comprehension of these sex-specific distinctions in health. It also
signals the social science neighborhoods to work with the scientist on collaborative work
required to direct the complicated or convoluted differences in men's and women's health.
In today's society, some physical factors that contribute to gender differences in health are as
follows: Women undergoing or encountering larger rates of depression and anxiety disorders
than men while men have larger rates of substance abuse, antisocial behavior and suicide than
women. According to the article, "there are three reference conditions that exhibit substantial
gender differences and they are: CVD, immune function and disorders and depression". The
authors also state that"men and women's physical health are very confusing. Women live longer
than men, yet they have higher morbidity rates".This means that women have a longer lifespan
than men even though they have a relative incidence of disease that often occurs.
According to the article, some of the social factors that contribute to gender differences in health
have not been used while scientists have investigated or reviewed some of the pathways through
which social factors might differentially affect men and women's health including positive and
negative health behaviors, exposure to stressors and coping lifestyles. In order for an individual
to lists some social factors that contribute to gender differences in health, the individual must
integrate social and biological procedures to preferably comprehend the distinction in men and
women's health.
The economic factors that contribute to gender differences in health is income. According to the
article, sex-specific differentiation in income may result from a variation and diversity of factors
over the life course including occupational choice, opportunities for employment and
advancement, work-related skills and experience, as well as job benefits including health
insurance, pension, and retirement income. Women are more than likely to be a single parent and
have reduced income per capita. The gain of income on health would be expected to be similar
for men and women, the levels of income may vary by sex-specific for a variety of reasons other
than the job one currently has. Welfare and income entitlements such as social security are tied to
both one's own employment and income history and that of one's spouse according to the article.
To conclude, gender differences in health is vital and we need to incorporate or integrate social
and biological perspectives. Constrained choice is a very crucial or key part that is lacking the
grasp or mastery of gender-specific distinctions in health. Constrained choice includes the gain
of governmental and workplace policies on men and women's health.
References
Rieker, P. P., & Bird, C. E. (2005). Rethinking gender differences in health: why we
need to integrate social and biological perspectives. The Journals of Gerontology
Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 60 (Special Issue 2), S40-S47.
Fall 2016 Social Construction of Illness powerpoint
Collapse
1)What is a disease? Ans:A disease is an illness or an abnormal condition that affects an
individual. A disease is also interpreted or understood as a medical condition associated with
specific signs and symptoms.
2) How do we know when we are sick? Ans: Severity of symptoms, type of symptoms, past
experience with the same symptom, pain, "objective markers" ex: temperature, length of time
you have had the symptoms, when told by a significant other, no longer able to do activities of
daily living, Moreover, fever, coughing, vomiting, diarrhea, strange rash and a cold.
3) What does viewpoint of medicine mean? Ans: The viewpoint of medicine concentrates on
biological and physiological factors as causes of irregular behavior, which is treated as a disease,
or mental illness and is investigated or diagnosed through symptoms and cured through
treatment.
4) What does viewpoint of the lifelong mean? Ans: The viewpoint of lifeworld is the sum total of
physical surroundings and everyday realities or experiences that make up an individual's world.
The viewpoint of lifeworld also may be perceived, believed or assumed as a universe of what is
self-evident or given, a world that subject's may experience together.
5)What is the differences between"individuals with AIDS" and AIDS patients? Ans: Individuals
with AIDS resist treatment while AIDS patient have treatment from their doctors.
6) Empathy video film
Summary
This video clip talks about empathy and if we could see inside an individuals heart. This video
clip was filmed at the Cleveland clinic headlining or displaying the need to comprehend an
individual in the medical setting. The direct conclusion or connotation is that such
comprehension goes beyond the medical setting, and can be transmitted to all settings where an
individual interacts. An excellent hint that we never know is what is going on inside an
individual we see walking down the street, and all around us. We all have our fraction of
problems and we try to help where we can and be sympathetic.
7) A New Epidemic Video
Summary
Motivational deficiency disorder is the severe or intense laziness an individual has and they don't
grasp.The condition is claimed to affect up to one in five Australians and is characterized by
overwhelming and debilitating disinterest. Neuro-scientist says that motivational deficiency
disorder can be fatal, because the condition reduces the motivation to breathe.
The question is that do I have this condition? No, I do not have this condition. Is this a real
disease? It is a fake disease imagined for a health campaign to raise alertness of disease
mongering.
8) How do you decide about when to limit or stop your usual daily functions and roles? Ans: I
decide when to limit or stop my usual daily functions and roles when I am sick.
9) What does it mean to us and others when we are sick? Ans: When we are sick, we can't do the
things we normally do on a regular basis.
10) How do you decide about when to go to the doctor? Ans: When I am sick for more than 5
days, I decide to go see a doctor.
11) Are the following conditions diseases?
Ans: Menopause ------> No
Pregnancy ---------> No
Color blindness ---------> Yes
Road rage ---------> No
Big noses --------> No
Small breasts ---------> No
Short stature --------> Yes
Short eyelashes ----------> Yes
Drug addiction -----------> Yes
Alcoholism ---------> Yes
RE: Getting Out/Getting In: The DSM, Political Activism, and the Social Construction of Mental
Disorders by Christopher Cotton and John W. Ridings
Collapse
What is the meaning of DSM? DSM stands for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental
Disorders which offers a common language and standard criteria for the classification of mental
disorders. The DSM was published by the American Psychiatric Association (APA). In the article
"Getting Out/Getting In: The DSM, Political Activism, and the Social Construction of Mental
Disorders" by Cotten, C., & Ridings, J.W., the authors looks over, examines or inspects the
diplomacy or governmental inclusion and exclusion in the DSM by reviewing or evaluating
homosexuality as a mental disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
PTSD is a mental health condition that is prompted or generated by a petrifying, horrifying or
frighten event either by experiencing or observing it. Homosexuality as a mental disorder was
removed from its official Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder (DSM) in 1973
by the American Psychiatric Association (APA). The American Psychiatric Association (APA)
expunged homosexuality as a mental disorder.
Reviewing or evaluating societal factors is essential or important to better comprehending and
describing the dramatic rise in the number of individual's diagnosed with PTSD and mental
disorders in recent years. Individual's with mental health disorders have a larger or bigger risk of
death that is two times bigger than the broad population. According to the article,"Getting
Out/Getting In: The DSM, Political Activism, and the Social Construction of Mental Disorders" by Cotten,
C., & Ridings, J.W., the authors state that "the DSM has become an influential and nationally
recognized classification system for mental disorders." This means that DSM is very popular and
it is used or dependent upon by scientists, clinicians, health insurance companies, the legal
system and pharmaceutical companies. According to the article,"Getting Out/Getting In: The
DSM, Political Activism, and the Social Construction of Mental Disorders" by Cotten, C., & Ridings, J.W.,
the authors state that "homosexuality and PTSD were the result of a confluence of deliberate,
targeted activism by social groups: mobilization of resources, and an amenable political climate."
This means that PTSD and homosexuality are the junction of 2 and there convergence were
singled out by social factors and groups.
According to the article,"Independent Review of Social and Population Variation in Mental
Health Could Improve Diagnosis in DSM revisions" by H.B. Hansen, Z, the author states that
"the forthcoming DSM-5, which is used by all psychiatrists, psychologists and mental health
workers in the United States has missed crucial population-level and social determinants of
mental health disorders and their diagnosis." This means that employees in the U.S has
misplaced important or essential element of mental disorders and their examination or
investigation. To conclude, PTSD is a mental health irregularity that is developed by horrifying
events that are observed and experienced. Homosexuality as a mental health irregularity was
expunged in 1973 by the American Psychiatric Association (APA). Moreover, the meaning of
DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) is a criteria for the classification
of mental disorders.
References
1. H. B. Hansen, Z. Donaldson, B. G. Link, P. S. Bearman, K. Hopper, L. M. Bates, K.
Cheslack-Postava, K. Harper, S. M. Holmes, G. Lovasi, K. W. Springer, J. O. Teitler. Independent
Review Of Social And Population Variation In Mental Health Could Improve Diagnosis In DSM
Revisions.Health Affairs, 2013; DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0596
2. Cotten, C., & Ridings, J. W. (2011). Getting out /Getting in: The DSM, Political Activism,
and the Social Construction of Mental Disorders. Social Work in Mental Health, 9(3), 181-205
Powerpoint Questions
Collapse
1) Do western societies have a right to interfere with culturally-based practices (like FGM) in
non-Western countries? Why/Why not?
Ans: According to the powerpoint "Fall 2016 Culture and Health for BB", the powerpoint states
that " In most western societies, FGM is considered a cultural tradition, which is often used as an
argument for its continuation." The powerpoint is saying that FGM's extensions is disputable. In
my opinion, I think that western societies have a right to interfere with culturally based practices
(like FGM) in non-Western countries because as the power point stated previously, it is a cultural
ritual that is exercised and it has religious guide.
2) What is the difference in calling the practice FGM vs. female genital cutting?
Ans: In the powerpoint "Fall 2016 Culture and Health for BB", the powerpoint states that "Female
genital mutilation (FGM) includes procedures that intentionally alter or injure female genital organs for
non-medical reasons." In other words, FGM makes reference to all methods comprising of the eradication
of the female genital organs. The powerpoint also makes a point that "female genital cutting is the
procedure that has no health benefits for girls and women. It is mostly carried out on young girls
sometime between infancy and 15 years." This means that female genital cutting means eliminating a
female's genitals for no medical reasons.
3) How can culturally-sensitive changes be made in non-Western countries?
Ans: Culturally-sensitive changes can be made in non-Western countries by cultural relativism and
competence. According to the powerpoint "Fall 2016 Culture and Health for BB", the powerpoint states
that "All cultures are of equal value and need to be studied from a neutral point of view." This means that
we need to admire each culture and embrace where we come from as decent human beings. The
powerpoint also states that " we cannot understand the a actions of other groups if we analyze them in
terms of our motives and values." This means that we need to grasp the idea that we are alike or
equivalent and that no culture is of higher rank to another. Moreover, the adage or saying goes
"don't judge a book by its cover" which is a famous quote which means don't start criticizing something or
someone you didn't even begin to comprehend.
4) Discuss a home remedy or treatment that your family uses that is based on your cultural background or
identity. What is the remedy or treatment? If you know, identify how it came about?
Ans: My cultural background or identity is Nigeria. My family uses home remedy or treatments from
Nigeria. The home remedy or treatment we use is Fufu which is America is chicken soup. A home remedy
or treatment that my family uses that is based on my cultural background or identity is Fufu. Fufu (chicken
soup) is an excellent alternative or choice when you have a cold. Fufu can assist in improving or
alleviating nasal blockage which can cure cold or cough. Fufu (chicken soup) augments or enhances the
nasal cavity that prohibits or puts an end to contamination or virus in an individual's human body.
RE: Immigration as a Social Determinant of Health
Collapse
According to the article "Immigration as a Social Determinant of Health" by Beyeler, N.,
Castaneda, H., De Trinidad Young NE., Holmes, S.M., Madrigal, D.S., & Quesuda, J., the
authors state that the importance of immigration and immigration community have developed in
the field of public health and public health analysis. Immigration involves strenuous
transformation for those who comprehend the process. The difficult process of transaction
between economic and bureaucratic forces make immigration difficult. The authors also state
that "the lack of dialogue between these two profoundly related phenomena- social determinants
of health and immigration- has resulted in missed opportunities for public health research,
practice, and policy work." (Beyeler, N., Castaneda, H., De Trinidad Young NE., Holmes, S.M.,
Madrigal, D.S., & Quesuda, J., p. 375). Therefore, the loss of interaction between those two parties
affects the public health and public health scientists ability to carry an effective research experience.
There are numerous social factors that affect an immigrant's health. In the article "Immigration as a Social
Determinant of Health", the social factors that affect a newcomer's health are "employment, housing and
living conditions, access to food and social services, and legal status are consequential for well-being." In
other words, an immigrant's health influences the way an individual lives such as any group of individual's
linked by blood and the income of an individual. The authors also state that "the primary focus remains on
how race and ethnicity-through culture- affects an individual health-related behaviors." (Beyeler, N.,
Castaneda, H., De Trinidad Young NE., Holmes, S.M., Madrigal, D.S., & Quesuda, J., p. 376). In other
words, the focal point is the background that an individual comes from that may influence an individual's
health behavior. The author also makes a point that "immigrant or minority groups are acculturating or
moving toward behaviors that are more in line with the mainstream group and that this process is found to
impact health negatively with individual-level health risk behavior especially diet, smoking and use of
health services." (Beyeler, N., Castaneda, H., De Trinidad Young NE., Holmes, S.M., Madrigal, D.S.,
& Quesuda, J., p. 380). In other words, foreigner's are gradually propelling toward bad behavior that is
similar to the average group.
The support services and programs I would recommend to enhance the lives of immigrants is the Robin
Hood Foundation in Central Brooklyn. This helps immigrants in fighting poverty and discrimination in this
country. The Robin Hood Foundation funded one hundred and eighty one million dollars last year and
also funded one hundred and thirty two million dollars in 2013. To conclude, immigration and immigration
neighborhoods have been the focal point of public health and public health research. Immigration is a
very grueling and difficult process in today's society. The public health scientists are very frustrated with
the absent communication between social determinants of health and immigration which causes lost
opportunities for public health scientist.
(PDF) OGBONNAYAAKPARAHNSC7110TOPICS. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328999995_OGBONNAYAAKPARAHNSC7110TOPICS [accessed Dec 16 2018].
Comments
Post a Comment